Ukraine vs Uzbekistan: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ukraine
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 157,609 t against 156,625 t in Ukraine, a difference of 984 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
Ukraine ranks 26th and Uzbekistan ranks 24th of 201 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ukraine | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 291,579 t | 102,348 t | 189,231 t | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 158,052 t | 92,454 t | 65,598 t | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 218,487 t | 125,112 t | 93,376 t | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 213,744 t | 138,877 t | 74,868 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Ukraine or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 157,609 t against 156,625 t in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Ukraine and Uzbekistan?
- 984 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ukraine and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ukraine and Uzbekistan rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Ukraine ranks 26th and Uzbekistan ranks 24th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).