United Republic of Tanzania vs Uzbekistan: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- United Republic of Tanzania
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 157,609 t against 54,827 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 102,782 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 2.9 times United Republic of Tanzania's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th and Uzbekistan ranks 22nd of 18 regions.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Republic of Tanzania | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,178 t | 102,348 t | 91,170 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 13,563 t | 92,454 t | 78,891 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 29,483 t | 125,112 t | 95,628 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 44,504 t | 138,877 t | 94,373 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, United Republic of Tanzania or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 157,609 t against 54,827 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between United Republic of Tanzania and Uzbekistan?
- 102,782 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Republic of Tanzania and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do United Republic of Tanzania and Uzbekistan rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th and Uzbekistan ranks 22nd of 18 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).