Afghanistan vs Uganda: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Afghanistan
- Uganda
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 10.03 kg/ha against 9.65 kg/ha in Uganda, a difference of 0.38 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 159th and Uganda ranks 160th of 201 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.99 kg/ha | 2.02 kg/ha | 5.97 kg/ha | Afghanistan |
| 1970s | 7.89 kg/ha | 2.34 kg/ha | 5.56 kg/ha | Afghanistan |
| 1980s | 6.45 kg/ha | 2.33 kg/ha | 4.13 kg/ha | Afghanistan |
| 1990s | 6.85 kg/ha | 3.82 kg/ha | 3.03 kg/ha | Afghanistan |
| 2000s | 7.93 kg/ha | 5.3 kg/ha | 2.63 kg/ha | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 10.41 kg/ha | 7.5 kg/ha | 2.92 kg/ha | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 10.03 kg/ha | 9.42 kg/ha | 0.6061 kg/ha | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Afghanistan or Uganda?
- Afghanistan, at 10.03 kg/ha against 9.65 kg/ha in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Afghanistan and Uganda?
- 0.38 kg/ha, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Uganda rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Afghanistan ranks 159th and Uganda ranks 160th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).