Africa vs Belarus: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Africa
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 91.88 kg/ha against 7.79 kg/ha in Africa, a difference of 84.09 kg/ha.
That makes Belarus's figure about 11.8 times Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Africa ranks 28th and Belarus ranks 31st of 32 groups.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.32 kg/ha | 87.62 kg/ha | 82.3 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2000s | 5.88 kg/ha | 92.03 kg/ha | 86.15 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2010s | 6.88 kg/ha | 99.03 kg/ha | 92.15 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2020s | 7.9 kg/ha | 90.26 kg/ha | 82.35 kg/ha | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Africa or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 91.88 kg/ha against 7.79 kg/ha in Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Africa and Belarus?
- 84.09 kg/ha, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Belarus?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Africa and Belarus rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Africa ranks 28th and Belarus ranks 31st of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).