Angola vs Cameroon: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Angola
- Cameroon
How they compare
Angola currently reports 8.43 kg/ha against 8.06 kg/ha in Cameroon, a difference of 0.37 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 164th and Cameroon ranks 167th of 201 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Cameroon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.99 kg/ha | 1.55 kg/ha | 0.4484 kg/ha | Angola |
| 1970s | 3.58 kg/ha | 2.52 kg/ha | 1.05 kg/ha | Angola |
| 1980s | 4.2 kg/ha | 3.43 kg/ha | 0.7753 kg/ha | Angola |
| 1990s | 4.35 kg/ha | 3.71 kg/ha | 0.6393 kg/ha | Angola |
| 2000s | 5.87 kg/ha | 4.99 kg/ha | 0.8838 kg/ha | Angola |
| 2010s | 8.03 kg/ha | 5.86 kg/ha | 2.17 kg/ha | Angola |
| 2020s | 8.49 kg/ha | 7.18 kg/ha | 1.31 kg/ha | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Angola or Cameroon?
- Angola, at 8.43 kg/ha against 8.06 kg/ha in Cameroon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Angola and Cameroon?
- 0.37 kg/ha, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Cameroon?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Cameroon rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Angola ranks 164th and Cameroon ranks 167th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).