Antigua and Barbuda vs Czechia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 36.53 kg/ha against 35.98 kg/ha in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.55 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 81st and Czechia ranks 79th of 201 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77.21 kg/ha | 48.17 kg/ha | 29.03 kg/ha | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2000s | 75 kg/ha | 42.51 kg/ha | 32.5 kg/ha | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 44.8 kg/ha | 41.55 kg/ha | 3.25 kg/ha | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2020s | 38.9 kg/ha | 36.54 kg/ha | 2.36 kg/ha | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Antigua and Barbuda or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 36.53 kg/ha against 35.98 kg/ha in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Antigua and Barbuda and Czechia?
- 0.55 kg/ha, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Czechia rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 81st and Czechia ranks 79th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).