Argentina vs Ghana: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Argentina
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 5.7 kg/ha against 5.03 kg/ha in Argentina, a difference of 0.67 kg/ha.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 184th and Ghana ranks 182nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 5 and Ghana in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.34 kg/ha | 1.26 kg/ha | 7.08 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 1970s | 8.17 kg/ha | 2.49 kg/ha | 5.69 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 1980s | 8.21 kg/ha | 2.64 kg/ha | 5.57 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 1990s | 7.14 kg/ha | 2.12 kg/ha | 5.02 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 2000s | 6.29 kg/ha | 4.69 kg/ha | 1.6 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 2010s | 5.63 kg/ha | 6.73 kg/ha | 1.1 kg/ha | Ghana |
| 2020s | 5.24 kg/ha | 7.37 kg/ha | 2.13 kg/ha | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Argentina or Ghana?
- Ghana, at 5.7 kg/ha against 5.03 kg/ha in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Argentina and Ghana?
- 0.67 kg/ha, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Ghana?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Ghana rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Argentina ranks 184th and Ghana ranks 182nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).