Argentina vs Sudan: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Argentina
- Sudan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 5.03 kg/ha against 4.66 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.37 kg/ha.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 184th and Sudan ranks 187th of 201 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.65 kg/ha | 4.84 kg/ha | 0.8098 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 2020s | 5.24 kg/ha | 4.67 kg/ha | 0.568 kg/ha | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Argentina or Sudan?
- Argentina, at 5.03 kg/ha against 4.66 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Argentina and Sudan?
- 0.37 kg/ha, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Sudan rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Argentina ranks 184th and Sudan ranks 187th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).