Armenia vs Eritrea: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Armenia
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 10.54 kg/ha against 10.25 kg/ha in Armenia, a difference of 0.29 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 156th and Eritrea ranks 155th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Eritrea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.48 kg/ha | 7.99 kg/ha | 3.49 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2000s | 7.79 kg/ha | 9.42 kg/ha | 1.64 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 9.22 kg/ha | 10.11 kg/ha | 0.8927 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 10.56 kg/ha | 10.53 kg/ha | 0.0312 kg/ha | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Armenia or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 10.54 kg/ha against 10.25 kg/ha in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Armenia and Eritrea?
- 0.29 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Eritrea rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Armenia ranks 156th and Eritrea ranks 155th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).