Australia and New Zealand vs French Polynesia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area

Australia and New Zealand
11.98 kg/ha
in 2023
French Polynesia
11.88 kg/ha
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
134th
French Polynesia rank
135th

Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • French Polynesia
51015202530196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 11.98 kg/ha against 11.88 kg/ha in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.1 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 134th and French Polynesia ranks 135th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and French Polynesia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand French Polynesia Difference Ahead
1960s 10.71 kg/ha 7.42 kg/ha 3.28 kg/ha Australia and New Zealand
1970s 16.14 kg/ha 12.72 kg/ha 3.42 kg/ha Australia and New Zealand
1980s 13.08 kg/ha 23.55 kg/ha 10.47 kg/ha French Polynesia
1990s 16.18 kg/ha 21.17 kg/ha 4.99 kg/ha French Polynesia
2000s 13.64 kg/ha 20.53 kg/ha 6.89 kg/ha French Polynesia
2010s 11.04 kg/ha 16.8 kg/ha 5.76 kg/ha French Polynesia
2020s 12.25 kg/ha 14.54 kg/ha 2.29 kg/ha French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Australia and New Zealand or French Polynesia?
Australia and New Zealand, at 11.98 kg/ha against 11.88 kg/ha in French Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Australia and New Zealand and French Polynesia?
0.1 kg/ha, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and French Polynesia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and French Polynesia rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 134th and French Polynesia ranks 135th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs French Polynesia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/australia-and-new-zealand/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/australia-and-new-zealand/french-polynesia/">Australia and New Zealand vs French Polynesia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).