Azerbaijan vs Maldives: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Azerbaijan
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 10.19 kg/ha against 9.38 kg/ha in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.81 kg/ha.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 161st and Maldives ranks 158th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 3 and Maldives in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.43 kg/ha | 0.532 kg/ha | 6.9 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 8.24 kg/ha | 7.31 kg/ha | 0.9323 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 9.1 kg/ha | 9.3 kg/ha | 0.194 kg/ha | Maldives |
| 2020s | 9.78 kg/ha | 9.47 kg/ha | 0.3082 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Azerbaijan or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 10.19 kg/ha against 9.38 kg/ha in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Azerbaijan and Maldives?
- 0.81 kg/ha, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Maldives?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Maldives rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 161st and Maldives ranks 158th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).