Bahamas vs Belize: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Bahamas
- Belize
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 42.9 kg/ha against 41.69 kg/ha in Belize, a difference of 1.21 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 71st and Belize ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 6 and Belize in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Belize | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 41.35 kg/ha | 9.85 kg/ha | 31.51 kg/ha | Bahamas |
| 1970s | 57.04 kg/ha | 12.41 kg/ha | 44.62 kg/ha | Bahamas |
| 1980s | 38.47 kg/ha | 20.21 kg/ha | 18.26 kg/ha | Bahamas |
| 1990s | 40.97 kg/ha | 18.02 kg/ha | 22.95 kg/ha | Bahamas |
| 2000s | 50.56 kg/ha | 11.38 kg/ha | 39.18 kg/ha | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 55.89 kg/ha | 37.43 kg/ha | 18.47 kg/ha | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 42.81 kg/ha | 44.36 kg/ha | 1.55 kg/ha | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Bahamas or Belize?
- Bahamas, at 42.9 kg/ha against 41.69 kg/ha in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Bahamas and Belize?
- 1.21 kg/ha, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Belize?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bahamas and Belize rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Bahamas ranks 71st and Belize ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).