Belarus vs Central African Republic: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Belarus
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 91.88 kg/ha against 6.17 kg/ha in Central African Republic, a difference of 85.71 kg/ha.
That makes Belarus's figure about 14.9 times Central African Republic's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 31st and Central African Republic ranks 30th of 201 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 87.62 kg/ha | 4.58 kg/ha | 83.04 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2000s | 92.03 kg/ha | 6.24 kg/ha | 85.79 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2010s | 99.03 kg/ha | 7.95 kg/ha | 91.08 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2020s | 90.26 kg/ha | 6.24 kg/ha | 84.01 kg/ha | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Belarus or Central African Republic?
- Belarus, at 91.88 kg/ha against 6.17 kg/ha in Central African Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Belarus and Central African Republic?
- 85.71 kg/ha, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Central African Republic?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Central African Republic rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Belarus ranks 31st and Central African Republic ranks 30th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).