Belize vs Croatia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Belize
- Croatia
How they compare
Belize currently reports 41.69 kg/ha against 38.61 kg/ha in Croatia, a difference of 3.08 kg/ha.
That makes Belize's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Belize ranks 73rd and Croatia ranks 75th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.45 kg/ha | 51.93 kg/ha | 35.48 kg/ha | Croatia |
| 2000s | 11.38 kg/ha | 64.28 kg/ha | 52.9 kg/ha | Croatia |
| 2010s | 37.43 kg/ha | 46.89 kg/ha | 9.47 kg/ha | Croatia |
| 2020s | 44.36 kg/ha | 43.41 kg/ha | 0.954 kg/ha | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Belize or Croatia?
- Belize, at 41.69 kg/ha against 38.61 kg/ha in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Belize and Croatia?
- 3.08 kg/ha, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Croatia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Croatia rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Belize ranks 73rd and Croatia ranks 75th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).