Bhutan vs Sri Lanka: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Bhutan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 19.25 kg/ha against 18.49 kg/ha in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.76 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Bhutan ranks 124th and Sri Lanka ranks 126th of 201 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 13.46 kg/ha | 25.02 kg/ha | 11.56 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 14.31 kg/ha | 21.96 kg/ha | 7.65 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 15.39 kg/ha | 33.72 kg/ha | 18.33 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 12.08 kg/ha | 33.73 kg/ha | 21.65 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 12.96 kg/ha | 32.28 kg/ha | 19.32 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 21.88 kg/ha | 29.71 kg/ha | 7.84 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 22.21 kg/ha | 30.4 kg/ha | 8.2 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Bhutan or Sri Lanka?
- Bhutan, at 19.25 kg/ha against 18.49 kg/ha in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Bhutan and Sri Lanka?
- 0.76 kg/ha, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Sri Lanka rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Bhutan ranks 124th and Sri Lanka ranks 126th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).