Botswana vs Chad: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Botswana
- Chad
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 15.38 kg/ha against 15.09 kg/ha in Chad, a difference of 0.29 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 135th and Chad ranks 137th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Chad in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.84 kg/ha | 2.93 kg/ha | 3.91 kg/ha | Botswana |
| 1970s | 9.58 kg/ha | 3 kg/ha | 6.58 kg/ha | Botswana |
| 1980s | 10.84 kg/ha | 3.52 kg/ha | 7.32 kg/ha | Botswana |
| 1990s | 9.54 kg/ha | 5.16 kg/ha | 4.37 kg/ha | Botswana |
| 2000s | 12.53 kg/ha | 7.75 kg/ha | 4.77 kg/ha | Botswana |
| 2010s | 9.82 kg/ha | 9.98 kg/ha | 0.1648 kg/ha | Chad |
| 2020s | 10.85 kg/ha | 13.66 kg/ha | 2.81 kg/ha | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Botswana or Chad?
- Botswana, at 15.38 kg/ha against 15.09 kg/ha in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Botswana and Chad?
- 0.29 kg/ha, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Chad?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Chad rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Botswana ranks 135th and Chad ranks 137th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).