Brazil vs Uzbekistan: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Brazil
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 132.6 kg/ha against 128.65 kg/ha in Brazil, a difference of 3.95 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Brazil ranks 21st and Uzbekistan ranks 18th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 56.22 kg/ha | 47.95 kg/ha | 8.27 kg/ha | Brazil |
| 2000s | 74.17 kg/ha | 50.78 kg/ha | 23.39 kg/ha | Brazil |
| 2010s | 96.34 kg/ha | 92.83 kg/ha | 3.5 kg/ha | Brazil |
| 2020s | 121.27 kg/ha | 121.37 kg/ha | 0.0988 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Brazil or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 132.6 kg/ha against 128.65 kg/ha in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Brazil and Uzbekistan?
- 3.95 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Uzbekistan rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Brazil ranks 21st and Uzbekistan ranks 18th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).