Bulgaria vs Chad: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Bulgaria
- Chad
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 15.88 kg/ha against 15.09 kg/ha in Chad, a difference of 0.79 kg/ha.
That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Bulgaria has been ahead every year.
Bulgaria ranks 134th and Chad ranks 137th of 201 countries.
Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 33.44 kg/ha | 2.93 kg/ha | 30.51 kg/ha | Bulgaria |
| 1970s | 41.59 kg/ha | 3 kg/ha | 38.59 kg/ha | Bulgaria |
| 1980s | 59.89 kg/ha | 3.52 kg/ha | 56.38 kg/ha | Bulgaria |
| 1990s | 25.98 kg/ha | 5.16 kg/ha | 20.81 kg/ha | Bulgaria |
| 2000s | 16.8 kg/ha | 7.75 kg/ha | 9.05 kg/ha | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 18.26 kg/ha | 9.98 kg/ha | 8.28 kg/ha | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 17.12 kg/ha | 13.66 kg/ha | 3.46 kg/ha | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Bulgaria or Chad?
- Bulgaria, at 15.88 kg/ha against 15.09 kg/ha in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Bulgaria and Chad?
- 0.79 kg/ha, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Chad?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bulgaria and Chad rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Bulgaria ranks 134th and Chad ranks 137th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).