Burkina Faso vs Ethiopia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Burkina Faso
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 8.18 kg/ha against 7.93 kg/ha in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.25 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 154th and Ethiopia ranks 156th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Ethiopia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.61 kg/ha | 5.75 kg/ha | 0.1447 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 7.13 kg/ha | 6.24 kg/ha | 0.8871 kg/ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 8.22 kg/ha | 7.82 kg/ha | 0.4077 kg/ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 7.01 kg/ha | 7.5 kg/ha | 0.4893 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Burkina Faso or Ethiopia?
- Burkina Faso, at 8.18 kg/ha against 7.93 kg/ha in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Burkina Faso and Ethiopia?
- 0.25 kg/ha, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Ethiopia rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Burkina Faso ranks 154th and Ethiopia ranks 156th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).