Canada vs India: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Canada
- India
How they compare
India currently reports 23.49 kg/ha against 23.36 kg/ha in Canada, a difference of 0.13 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 109th and India ranks 108th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and India in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11.98 kg/ha | 8.78 kg/ha | 3.2 kg/ha | Canada |
| 1970s | 12.5 kg/ha | 10.57 kg/ha | 1.93 kg/ha | Canada |
| 1980s | 13.47 kg/ha | 13.96 kg/ha | 0.4878 kg/ha | India |
| 1990s | 12.38 kg/ha | 16.92 kg/ha | 4.55 kg/ha | India |
| 2000s | 12.43 kg/ha | 22.73 kg/ha | 10.3 kg/ha | India |
| 2010s | 14.25 kg/ha | 25.28 kg/ha | 11.02 kg/ha | India |
| 2020s | 22.16 kg/ha | 25.19 kg/ha | 3.03 kg/ha | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Canada or India?
- India, at 23.49 kg/ha against 23.36 kg/ha in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Canada and India?
- 0.13 kg/ha, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and India?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and India rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Canada ranks 109th and India ranks 108th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).