Caribbean vs Yugoslav SFR: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Caribbean
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 22.87 kg/ha against 22.56 kg/ha in Caribbean, a difference of 0.31 kg/ha.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Caribbean has been ahead every year.
Caribbean ranks 112th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 111th of 201 countries.
Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 37.72 kg/ha | 20.01 kg/ha | 17.71 kg/ha | Caribbean |
| 1970s | 39.71 kg/ha | 24.29 kg/ha | 15.42 kg/ha | Caribbean |
| 1980s | 46.46 kg/ha | 28.07 kg/ha | 18.39 kg/ha | Caribbean |
| 1990s | 36.21 kg/ha | 23.75 kg/ha | 12.46 kg/ha | Caribbean |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Caribbean or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 22.87 kg/ha against 22.56 kg/ha in Caribbean as of 1991.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Caribbean and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.31 kg/ha, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Caribbean and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Caribbean ranks 112th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 111th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).