Central African Republic vs Luxembourg: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Central African Republic
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 100.14 kg/ha against 6.17 kg/ha in Central African Republic, a difference of 93.97 kg/ha.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 16.2 times Central African Republic's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 30th and Luxembourg ranks 28th of 32 groups.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.24 kg/ha | 105.92 kg/ha | 99.68 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 7.95 kg/ha | 101.84 kg/ha | 93.89 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 6.24 kg/ha | 99.59 kg/ha | 93.35 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Central African Republic or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 100.14 kg/ha against 6.17 kg/ha in Central African Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Central African Republic and Luxembourg?
- 93.97 kg/ha, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and Luxembourg rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Central African Republic ranks 30th and Luxembourg ranks 28th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).