Chad vs Zambia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Chad
- Zambia
How they compare
Chad currently reports 15.09 kg/ha against 12.74 kg/ha in Zambia, a difference of 2.35 kg/ha.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 131st and Zambia ranks 133rd of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.93 kg/ha | 1.82 kg/ha | 1.11 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1970s | 3 kg/ha | 3.47 kg/ha | 0.4755 kg/ha | Zambia |
| 1980s | 3.52 kg/ha | 4.61 kg/ha | 1.09 kg/ha | Zambia |
| 1990s | 5.16 kg/ha | 5.06 kg/ha | 0.1005 kg/ha | Chad |
| 2000s | 7.75 kg/ha | 7.53 kg/ha | 0.2228 kg/ha | Chad |
| 2010s | 9.98 kg/ha | 9.22 kg/ha | 0.759 kg/ha | Chad |
| 2020s | 13.66 kg/ha | 14.22 kg/ha | 0.5659 kg/ha | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Chad or Zambia?
- Chad, at 15.09 kg/ha against 12.74 kg/ha in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Chad and Zambia?
- 2.35 kg/ha, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Zambia rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Chad ranks 131st and Zambia ranks 133rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).