Chile vs Spain: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Chile
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 44.28 kg/ha against 43.7 kg/ha in Chile, a difference of 0.58 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Spain ahead.
Chile ranks 69th and Spain ranks 67th of 201 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.76 kg/ha | 19.59 kg/ha | 10.83 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1970s | 9.97 kg/ha | 28.25 kg/ha | 18.28 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1980s | 12.12 kg/ha | 32.7 kg/ha | 20.58 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1990s | 35.74 kg/ha | 41.82 kg/ha | 6.08 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2000s | 42.41 kg/ha | 47.27 kg/ha | 4.85 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2010s | 38.61 kg/ha | 46.09 kg/ha | 7.48 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2020s | 42.36 kg/ha | 47.73 kg/ha | 5.37 kg/ha | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Chile or Spain?
- Spain, at 44.28 kg/ha against 43.7 kg/ha in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Chile and Spain?
- 0.58 kg/ha, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Spain?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Spain rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Chile ranks 69th and Spain ranks 67th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).