China, Hong Kong SAR vs Montenegro: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 440.96 kg/ha against 262.75 kg/ha in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 178.21 kg/ha.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.7 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 7th and Montenegro ranks 4th of 185 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 141.22 kg/ha | 672.2 kg/ha | 530.99 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 198.89 kg/ha | 544.95 kg/ha | 346.06 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 264.77 kg/ha | 453.97 kg/ha | 189.19 kg/ha | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, China, Hong Kong SAR or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 440.96 kg/ha against 262.75 kg/ha in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between China, Hong Kong SAR and Montenegro?
- 178.21 kg/ha, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Montenegro rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 7th and Montenegro ranks 4th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).