China, mainland vs Tajikistan: Input β Cropland potassium per unit area
Input β Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- China, mainland
- Tajikistan
How they compare
China, mainland currently reports 94.35 kg/ha against 91.65 kg/ha in Tajikistan, a difference of 2.7 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
China, mainland ranks 30th and Tajikistan ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
China, mainland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, mainland | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.28 kg/ha | 48.11 kg/ha | 0.1774 kg/ha | China, mainland |
| 2000s | 67.37 kg/ha | 57.25 kg/ha | 10.12 kg/ha | China, mainland |
| 2010s | 92.86 kg/ha | 86.35 kg/ha | 6.51 kg/ha | China, mainland |
| 2020s | 94.09 kg/ha | 92.59 kg/ha | 1.5 kg/ha | China, mainland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input β cropland potassium per unit area, China, mainland or Tajikistan?
- China, mainland, at 94.35 kg/ha against 91.65 kg/ha in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input β cropland potassium per unit area between China, mainland and Tajikistan?
- 2.7 kg/ha, with China, mainland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do China, mainland and Tajikistan rank globally for input β cropland potassium per unit area?
- China, mainland ranks 30th and Tajikistan ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input β Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).