China vs Luxembourg: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- China
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 100.14 kg/ha against 98.02 kg/ha in China, a difference of 2.12 kg/ha.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
China ranks 29th and Luxembourg ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.02 kg/ha | 105.92 kg/ha | 40.91 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 89.16 kg/ha | 101.84 kg/ha | 12.68 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 95.23 kg/ha | 99.59 kg/ha | 4.36 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, China or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 100.14 kg/ha against 98.02 kg/ha in China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between China and Luxembourg?
- 2.12 kg/ha, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do China and Luxembourg rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- China ranks 29th and Luxembourg ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).