Cook Islands vs Turkmenistan: Input β Cropland potassium per unit area
Input β Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cook Islands
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 76.23 kg/ha against 72.71 kg/ha in Cook Islands, a difference of 3.52 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 42nd and Turkmenistan ranks 41st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cook Islands averaged higher in 3 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42.84 kg/ha | 43.25 kg/ha | 0.4085 kg/ha | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 72.41 kg/ha | 55.18 kg/ha | 17.23 kg/ha | Cook Islands |
| 2010s | 99.13 kg/ha | 63.62 kg/ha | 35.51 kg/ha | Cook Islands |
| 2020s | 77.38 kg/ha | 76.29 kg/ha | 1.09 kg/ha | Cook Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input β cropland potassium per unit area, Cook Islands or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 76.23 kg/ha against 72.71 kg/ha in Cook Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input β cropland potassium per unit area between Cook Islands and Turkmenistan?
- 3.52 kg/ha, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cook Islands and Turkmenistan rank globally for input β cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cook Islands ranks 42nd and Turkmenistan ranks 41st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input β Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).