Cuba vs Madagascar: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 11.27 kg/ha against 10.71 kg/ha in Cuba, a difference of 0.56 kg/ha.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 142nd and Madagascar ranks 139th of 186 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 56.87 kg/ha | 10.15 kg/ha | 46.72 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 47.58 kg/ha | 9.99 kg/ha | 37.59 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1980s | 64.27 kg/ha | 10.83 kg/ha | 53.44 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1990s | 26.9 kg/ha | 10.39 kg/ha | 16.51 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 16.75 kg/ha | 8.45 kg/ha | 8.3 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 19.8 kg/ha | 10.47 kg/ha | 9.33 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 11.18 kg/ha | 10.86 kg/ha | 0.3161 kg/ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Cuba or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 11.27 kg/ha against 10.71 kg/ha in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Cuba and Madagascar?
- 0.56 kg/ha, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Madagascar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Madagascar rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 142nd and Madagascar ranks 139th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).