Cyprus vs Nicaragua: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cyprus
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 45.22 kg/ha against 44.69 kg/ha in Cyprus, a difference of 0.53 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Cyprus ranks 66th and Nicaragua ranks 64th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 5 and Nicaragua in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.2 kg/ha | 18.13 kg/ha | 11.93 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
| 1970s | 13.08 kg/ha | 24.65 kg/ha | 11.57 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
| 1980s | 19.54 kg/ha | 16.79 kg/ha | 2.75 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 1990s | 35.42 kg/ha | 13.58 kg/ha | 21.84 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 40.4 kg/ha | 26.41 kg/ha | 13.99 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 52 kg/ha | 39.46 kg/ha | 12.54 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 48.59 kg/ha | 46.43 kg/ha | 2.16 kg/ha | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Cyprus or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 45.22 kg/ha against 44.69 kg/ha in Cyprus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Cyprus and Nicaragua?
- 0.53 kg/ha, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Nicaragua?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Nicaragua rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cyprus ranks 66th and Nicaragua ranks 64th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).