Czechia vs Thailand: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 38.13 kg/ha against 36.53 kg/ha in Czechia, a difference of 1.6 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 79th and Thailand ranks 76th of 201 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.17 kg/ha | 22.38 kg/ha | 25.79 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 42.51 kg/ha | 21.13 kg/ha | 21.38 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 41.55 kg/ha | 28.17 kg/ha | 13.38 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 36.54 kg/ha | 33.78 kg/ha | 2.76 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Czechia or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 38.13 kg/ha against 36.53 kg/ha in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Czechia and Thailand?
- 1.6 kg/ha, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Thailand?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Thailand rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 79th and Thailand ranks 76th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).