Czechoslovakia vs Papua New Guinea: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 19.93 kg/ha against 19.61 kg/ha in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 0.32 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 121st and Papua New Guinea ranks 118th of 201 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 38.98 kg/ha | 8.72 kg/ha | 30.26 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 55.83 kg/ha | 10.77 kg/ha | 45.06 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 54.24 kg/ha | 11.84 kg/ha | 42.4 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 28.64 kg/ha | 11.43 kg/ha | 17.21 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Czechoslovakia or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 19.93 kg/ha against 19.61 kg/ha in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Czechoslovakia and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.32 kg/ha, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Papua New Guinea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 121st and Papua New Guinea ranks 118th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).