Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area

Democratic Republic of the Congo
1.08 kg/ha
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic
2.01 kg/ha
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
18th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
17th

Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Syrian Arab Republic
11.522.53196119922023

How they compare

Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 2.01 kg/ha against 1.08 kg/ha in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 0.93 kg/ha.

That makes Syrian Arab Republic's figure about 1.9 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 18th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 17th of 18 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 2 and Syrian Arab Republic in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 1.11 kg/ha 0.9714 kg/ha 0.1377 kg/ha Democratic Republic of the Congo
1970s 1.41 kg/ha 1.3 kg/ha 0.1087 kg/ha Democratic Republic of the Congo
1980s 1.55 kg/ha 2.18 kg/ha 0.6251 kg/ha Syrian Arab Republic
1990s 1.96 kg/ha 2.38 kg/ha 0.4111 kg/ha Syrian Arab Republic
2000s 1.69 kg/ha 2.8 kg/ha 1.11 kg/ha Syrian Arab Republic
2010s 1.14 kg/ha 1.89 kg/ha 0.7524 kg/ha Syrian Arab Republic
2020s 1.07 kg/ha 1.77 kg/ha 0.7018 kg/ha Syrian Arab Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Syrian Arab Republic?
Syrian Arab Republic, at 2.01 kg/ha against 1.08 kg/ha in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic?
0.93 kg/ha, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 18th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 17th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).