Djibouti vs Malta: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Djibouti
- Malta
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 175.91 kg/ha against 143.96 kg/ha in Malta, a difference of 31.95 kg/ha.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Djibouti has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 13th and Malta ranks 16th of 201 countries.
Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 771.99 kg/ha | 57.21 kg/ha | 714.78 kg/ha | Djibouti |
| 1970s | 881.52 kg/ha | 89.1 kg/ha | 792.43 kg/ha | Djibouti |
| 1980s | 501.93 kg/ha | 126.73 kg/ha | 375.2 kg/ha | Djibouti |
| 1990s | 392.69 kg/ha | 176.37 kg/ha | 216.32 kg/ha | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 370.2 kg/ha | 198.41 kg/ha | 171.79 kg/ha | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 246.02 kg/ha | 135.68 kg/ha | 110.34 kg/ha | Djibouti |
| 2020s | 178.95 kg/ha | 140.83 kg/ha | 38.12 kg/ha | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Djibouti or Malta?
- Djibouti, at 175.91 kg/ha against 143.96 kg/ha in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Djibouti and Malta?
- 31.95 kg/ha, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Malta rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Djibouti ranks 13th and Malta ranks 16th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).