Ecuador vs Turkmenistan: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ecuador
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 76.23 kg/ha against 67.64 kg/ha in Ecuador, a difference of 8.59 kg/ha.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Ecuador ranks 44th and Turkmenistan ranks 41st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32.99 kg/ha | 43.25 kg/ha | 10.26 kg/ha | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 50.47 kg/ha | 55.18 kg/ha | 4.7 kg/ha | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 67.34 kg/ha | 63.62 kg/ha | 3.72 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 70.25 kg/ha | 76.29 kg/ha | 6.05 kg/ha | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Ecuador or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 76.23 kg/ha against 67.64 kg/ha in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Ecuador and Turkmenistan?
- 8.59 kg/ha, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Turkmenistan rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ecuador ranks 44th and Turkmenistan ranks 41st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).