Egypt vs Myanmar: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Egypt
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 37.23 kg/ha against 35.99 kg/ha in Egypt, a difference of 1.24 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.
Egypt ranks 80th and Myanmar ranks 78th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.66 kg/ha | 16.15 kg/ha | 10.49 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 1970s | 7.72 kg/ha | 20.98 kg/ha | 13.26 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 1980s | 14.91 kg/ha | 27.5 kg/ha | 12.59 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 1990s | 16.76 kg/ha | 28.53 kg/ha | 11.76 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 20.67 kg/ha | 33.25 kg/ha | 12.58 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 24.63 kg/ha | 43.26 kg/ha | 18.63 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 35.05 kg/ha | 34.66 kg/ha | 0.3932 kg/ha | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Egypt or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 37.23 kg/ha against 35.99 kg/ha in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Egypt and Myanmar?
- 1.24 kg/ha, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Myanmar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Myanmar rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Egypt ranks 80th and Myanmar ranks 78th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).