El Salvador vs Estonia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- El Salvador
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 34.2 kg/ha against 31.68 kg/ha in El Salvador, a difference of 2.52 kg/ha.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
El Salvador ranks 84th and Estonia ranks 81st of 186 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 27.96 kg/ha | 42.38 kg/ha | 14.43 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 31.23 kg/ha | 41.5 kg/ha | 10.26 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 32.12 kg/ha | 42.04 kg/ha | 9.92 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 33.18 kg/ha | 39.09 kg/ha | 5.91 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, El Salvador or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 34.2 kg/ha against 31.68 kg/ha in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between El Salvador and Estonia?
- 2.52 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Estonia rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- El Salvador ranks 84th and Estonia ranks 81st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).