Eritrea vs Guinea-Bissau: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 10.54 kg/ha against 10.21 kg/ha in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.33 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Eritrea ranks 144th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 146th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.99 kg/ha | 8.88 kg/ha | 0.8808 kg/ha | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 9.42 kg/ha | 8.18 kg/ha | 1.24 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 10.11 kg/ha | 10.91 kg/ha | 0.7984 kg/ha | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 10.53 kg/ha | 10.48 kg/ha | 0.0548 kg/ha | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Eritrea or Guinea-Bissau?
- Eritrea, at 10.54 kg/ha against 10.21 kg/ha in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Eritrea and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.33 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Guinea-Bissau?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 144th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 146th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).