Estonia vs North Macedonia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Estonia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 34.2 kg/ha against 32.35 kg/ha in North Macedonia, a difference of 1.85 kg/ha.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 85th and North Macedonia ranks 87th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42.38 kg/ha | 44.7 kg/ha | 2.32 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 41.5 kg/ha | 45.47 kg/ha | 3.97 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 42.04 kg/ha | 49.07 kg/ha | 7.03 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 39.09 kg/ha | 37.78 kg/ha | 1.31 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Estonia or North Macedonia?
- Estonia, at 34.2 kg/ha against 32.35 kg/ha in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Estonia and North Macedonia?
- 1.85 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and North Macedonia rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 85th and North Macedonia ranks 87th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).