Eswatini vs Grenada: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eswatini
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 22.24 kg/ha against 21.42 kg/ha in Eswatini, a difference of 0.82 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 114th and Grenada ranks 113th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Grenada in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14.2 kg/ha | 11.79 kg/ha | 2.41 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 21.82 kg/ha | 14.16 kg/ha | 7.66 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 25.85 kg/ha | 14.76 kg/ha | 11.09 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 17.97 kg/ha | 19.63 kg/ha | 1.66 kg/ha | Grenada |
| 2000s | 16.01 kg/ha | 16 kg/ha | 0.0109 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 17.29 kg/ha | 24.55 kg/ha | 7.26 kg/ha | Grenada |
| 2020s | 22.67 kg/ha | 23.51 kg/ha | 0.8399 kg/ha | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Eswatini or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 22.24 kg/ha against 21.42 kg/ha in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Eswatini and Grenada?
- 0.82 kg/ha, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Grenada?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Grenada rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eswatini ranks 114th and Grenada ranks 113th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).