Ethiopia PDR vs Libya: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 3.35 kg/ha against 2.85 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.5 kg/ha.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia PDR's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 193rd and Libya ranks 190th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 3 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.08 kg/ha | 1.03 kg/ha | 1.05 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 1.8 kg/ha | 1.78 kg/ha | 0.0249 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 2.1 kg/ha | 2.18 kg/ha | 0.0875 kg/ha | Libya |
| 1990s | 2.79 kg/ha | 2.02 kg/ha | 0.7734 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Libya?
- Libya, at 3.35 kg/ha against 2.85 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Libya?
- 0.5 kg/ha, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Libya rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 193rd and Libya ranks 190th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).