Ethiopia PDR vs Sierra Leone: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 3.31 kg/ha against 2.85 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.46 kg/ha.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia PDR's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Sierra Leone has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 180th and Sierra Leone ranks 178th of 186 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.08 kg/ha | 2.69 kg/ha | 0.6102 kg/ha | Sierra Leone |
| 1970s | 1.8 kg/ha | 3.15 kg/ha | 1.35 kg/ha | Sierra Leone |
| 1980s | 2.1 kg/ha | 3.38 kg/ha | 1.28 kg/ha | Sierra Leone |
| 1990s | 2.79 kg/ha | 3.41 kg/ha | 0.6143 kg/ha | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 3.31 kg/ha against 2.85 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Sierra Leone?
- 0.46 kg/ha, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Sierra Leone?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Sierra Leone rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 180th and Sierra Leone ranks 178th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).