Ethiopia PDR vs Tunisia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Tunisia
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 2.85 kg/ha against 2.65 kg/ha in Tunisia, a difference of 0.2 kg/ha.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 193rd and Tunisia ranks 196th of 201 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.08 kg/ha | 1.48 kg/ha | 0.6051 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 1.8 kg/ha | 1.66 kg/ha | 0.1399 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 2.1 kg/ha | 1.82 kg/ha | 0.2734 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 2.79 kg/ha | 1.72 kg/ha | 1.07 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Tunisia?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 2.85 kg/ha against 2.65 kg/ha in Tunisia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Tunisia?
- 0.2 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Tunisia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Tunisia rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 193rd and Tunisia ranks 196th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).