Ethiopia vs Kazakhstan: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 7.93 kg/ha against 7.51 kg/ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.42 kg/ha.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 157th and Kazakhstan ranks 160th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.75 kg/ha | 7.82 kg/ha | 2.07 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 6.24 kg/ha | 6.95 kg/ha | 0.7116 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 7.82 kg/ha | 8.06 kg/ha | 0.2444 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 7.5 kg/ha | 7.45 kg/ha | 0.0512 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia or Kazakhstan?
- Ethiopia, at 7.93 kg/ha against 7.51 kg/ha in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia and Kazakhstan?
- 0.42 kg/ha, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Kazakhstan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Kazakhstan rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 157th and Kazakhstan ranks 160th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).