European Union (27) vs Montenegro: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- European Union (27)
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 440.96 kg/ha against 53.43 kg/ha in European Union (27), a difference of 387.53 kg/ha.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 8.3 times European Union (27)'s.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
European Union (27) ranks 3rd and Montenegro ranks 4th of 10 groups.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | European Union (27) | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.53 kg/ha | 672.2 kg/ha | 612.68 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 59.07 kg/ha | 544.95 kg/ha | 485.88 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 56.62 kg/ha | 453.97 kg/ha | 397.34 kg/ha | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, European Union (27) or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 440.96 kg/ha against 53.43 kg/ha in European Union (27) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between European Union (27) and Montenegro?
- 387.53 kg/ha, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for European Union (27) and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do European Union (27) and Montenegro rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- European Union (27) ranks 3rd and Montenegro ranks 4th of 10 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).