Fiji vs Pakistan: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Fiji
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 35.72 kg/ha against 34.34 kg/ha in Fiji, a difference of 1.38 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 84th and Pakistan ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 5 and Pakistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.02 kg/ha | 6.04 kg/ha | 2.98 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1970s | 16.59 kg/ha | 7.86 kg/ha | 8.72 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1980s | 25.41 kg/ha | 10.81 kg/ha | 14.6 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1990s | 32.61 kg/ha | 14.43 kg/ha | 18.18 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2000s | 23.09 kg/ha | 18.86 kg/ha | 4.23 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2010s | 26.01 kg/ha | 26.44 kg/ha | 0.4384 kg/ha | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 27.21 kg/ha | 33.95 kg/ha | 6.74 kg/ha | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Fiji or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 35.72 kg/ha against 34.34 kg/ha in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Fiji and Pakistan?
- 1.38 kg/ha, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Pakistan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Pakistan rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Fiji ranks 84th and Pakistan ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).