Georgia vs Tonga: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 19.33 kg/ha against 18.7 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.63 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 125th and Tonga ranks 123rd of 201 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.99 kg/ha | 20.98 kg/ha | 11.99 kg/ha | Tonga |
| 2000s | 12.22 kg/ha | 21.53 kg/ha | 9.31 kg/ha | Tonga |
| 2010s | 15.52 kg/ha | 21.24 kg/ha | 5.72 kg/ha | Tonga |
| 2020s | 18.94 kg/ha | 20.15 kg/ha | 1.21 kg/ha | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Georgia or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 19.33 kg/ha against 18.7 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Georgia and Tonga?
- 0.63 kg/ha, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Tonga?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Tonga rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 125th and Tonga ranks 123rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).