Georgia vs Vanuatu: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 18.7 kg/ha against 16.9 kg/ha in Vanuatu, a difference of 1.8 kg/ha.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Vanuatu's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Vanuatu ahead.
Georgia ranks 119th and Vanuatu ranks 122nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Vanuatu in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.99 kg/ha | 12.07 kg/ha | 3.08 kg/ha | Vanuatu |
| 2000s | 12.22 kg/ha | 12.75 kg/ha | 0.5273 kg/ha | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 15.52 kg/ha | 17.9 kg/ha | 2.38 kg/ha | Vanuatu |
| 2020s | 18.94 kg/ha | 15.34 kg/ha | 3.6 kg/ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Georgia or Vanuatu?
- Georgia, at 18.7 kg/ha against 16.9 kg/ha in Vanuatu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Georgia and Vanuatu?
- 1.8 kg/ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Vanuatu?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Vanuatu rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 119th and Vanuatu ranks 122nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).