Guinea vs Tunisia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Guinea
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 2.65 kg/ha against 2.6 kg/ha in Guinea, a difference of 0.05 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.
Guinea ranks 197th and Tunisia ranks 196th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.19 kg/ha | 1.48 kg/ha | 0.2893 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 1.09 kg/ha | 1.66 kg/ha | 0.5745 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 1.07 kg/ha | 1.82 kg/ha | 0.7522 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 1.51 kg/ha | 2.02 kg/ha | 0.511 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 2.28 kg/ha | 2.77 kg/ha | 0.4853 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 2.79 kg/ha | 2.94 kg/ha | 0.1448 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 3.24 kg/ha | 3.18 kg/ha | 0.0546 kg/ha | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Guinea or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 2.65 kg/ha against 2.6 kg/ha in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Guinea and Tunisia?
- 0.05 kg/ha, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guinea and Tunisia rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Guinea ranks 197th and Tunisia ranks 196th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).