Guyana vs Tuvalu: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Guyana
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 52.69 kg/ha against 51.03 kg/ha in Tuvalu, a difference of 1.66 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 57th and Tuvalu ranks 58th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 3 and Tuvalu in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 35.14 kg/ha | 18.77 kg/ha | 16.37 kg/ha | Guyana |
| 1970s | 36.38 kg/ha | 19.01 kg/ha | 17.37 kg/ha | Guyana |
| 1980s | 23.06 kg/ha | 26.33 kg/ha | 3.27 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 1990s | 24.25 kg/ha | 40.69 kg/ha | 16.44 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2000s | 27.18 kg/ha | 49.57 kg/ha | 22.39 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 42.76 kg/ha | 50.54 kg/ha | 7.78 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 51.16 kg/ha | 51.09 kg/ha | 0.072 kg/ha | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Guyana or Tuvalu?
- Guyana, at 52.69 kg/ha against 51.03 kg/ha in Tuvalu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Guyana and Tuvalu?
- 1.66 kg/ha, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Tuvalu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Tuvalu rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Guyana ranks 57th and Tuvalu ranks 58th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).